Saturday, 12 May 2018

HE HAD THE STAMP: Who Are The Windrush Generation?



THE PROBLEM THE UK NOW HAS, IS ONE OF TRUSTWORTHINESS.

When one takes a brief run through immigration into the UK since the end of the Second World War, one turns up some interesting patterns of behaviour on the part of the UK government. However, I am particularly interested in the migration of Jamaican subjects to the UK. It is necessary to mention Poland as they are right at the very beginning and the end with regard to this subject.

For example, the only group of people successfully integrated into UK society immediately after WWII were East European, most of whom were Polish. I wonder if the UK ever considers the part they played in something called communism for the Polish people they did not take, or how the Polish people came to be subjugated. I seem to vaguely remember the name of a place called Yalta.





AFTER THE WAR POLES WERE FIRST 
 
Please prepare yourself because many people are described by use of the word "ALIEN". This is the term used by the UK for those not under their subjugation. I have included this extract because I am curious as to why this was a success and others were treated so badly.


A Nation of Immigrants?  A Brief Demographic History of Britain

David Conway (Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society)



“Post‐war immigration to Britain today is commonly associated with that originating from former British colonies… In the immediate post‐War period, however, it was nationals of some of the very same Eastern European countries from which large numbers of immigrants are presently coming to Britain who first began to settle there. Their settlement is little spoken of today, but at the time their arrival was much discussed…


…Just how much of a silent revolution was the admittance to Britain of these displaced Europeans is indicated by the fact that: ‘Whereas in 1939 there had been only about 239,000 aliens over the age of 16 in the United Kingdom (of whom… about 80,000 were refugees) this figure had, by December 1950, been increased to 424,329.


The increase of roughly 200,000 was the net gain from the admittance in these years of approximately 250,000 aliens.’
 

The most sizable group of such immigrants were 130,000 Poles of whom 100,000 had served in the Polish Armed Forces (PAF), all of whom were offered the opportunity to settle permanently in Britain after the war. The remaining 30,000 Poles who settled were dependents of members of the PAF who took up the offer.
 
THE UK KEEPS 130,000 POLISH PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY HELPED THEM WIN THE WAR AND GAVE THE REST AWAY. WHO NEEDS ENEMIES? HOW LONG DID IT TAKE THE UK TO FORGET?

The first large group to migrate to the UK after the war were Polish, is that not a surprise? What is more, they were invited to stay. I think when compared to what happened to the Chinese, it is particularly noteworthy. It makes one wonder as to the motive for treating the two groups so differently. These two events happened more or less contemporaneously.




So, let's have a look at what happened to 300 Chinese fathers who had served in the British Merchant Navy: DISAPPEARED WITHOUT TRACE. Does that not appear rather drastic? 

Yes! It does sound drastic, but the UK has been disappearing JAMAICANS IN THIS WAY FOR NEARLY 50 YEARS. 

Do not forget how Australia was populated with their cousins to whom they now give special treatment. Disappeared from the UK. No one is safe from the UK machine! Time goes by and the facts disappear into the ether. IF THEY  EVER SURFACE, TOO LATE!


See for yourself what happened to the Chinese: 




A protest led by a Mrs Lee in August 1946, reported in both the Liverpool Echo and the News Chronicle news­papers, proved fruitless. The reasons behind the disappear­ance of the men were kept a closely guarded secret by the British authorities – and it would be decades before the truth began to emerge.


Charles Foley found that government officials dismissed those married to or cohabiting with a Chinese partner as “the prostitute class”.



 “There are lots of dark shadows in this story,” Foley says.




Why did 300 Chinese fathers vanish from Liverpool in 1946 after wartime service in British merchant navy?
Kept secret by the British government, the disappearance of sailors who’d braved German U-boats through the second world war left many Eurasian children to grow up not knowing what happened to their dads
4 Nov 2017 / UPDATED ON 4 Dec 2017

Read their story for yourself here: https://t.co/b1xfMP6uss 






EXAMPLES OF THIS BEHAVIOUR FROM THE UK IS LEGENDARY? THEY TRULY SUFFER FROM  SERIAL FORGETFULNESS. SOMETIMES IT TAKES ONLY MONTHS SOMETIMES HUNDREDS OF YEARS. THE RESULT IS ALWAYS THE SAME, YOU END UP DEAD AND THEY MOVE ON TO THE NEXT VICTIM.





SO TO THE EMPIRE WINDRUSH!

WEST INDIAN MIGRATION TO THE UK: HOW IT BEGAN


The story of how West Indians began to migrate to the UK as everyone knows began in 1948 with the Empire Windrush. However, what is little known  is how significant was the landing of the Windrush in Tilbury Docks. Jamaicans are extremely adventurous and as no-one had taken up the United Kingdom on their offer of citizenship to 800 million people. That is what they had done! The Jamaicans who came over on this ship, did so without asking for permission from the UK government, or anyone else. They did not have to. They felt like coming, so they did. They were UK citizens. They had to be treated exactly the same as any person born in the UK. They were subjects of the United Kingdom and Colonies.

So, the question which needs to be asked is, when did it end

When speaking of the Windrush Generation, that is the most important question.



A Nation of Immigrants?  A Brief Demographic History of Britain

David Conway (Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society)

"West Indians began to arrive in Britain in increasing numbers during the 1950s, often after having been recruited in the West Indies by British public‐sector employers, most notably London Transport and the National Health Service.


They had been preceded in 1948, however, by the arrival of several hundred Jamaicans who had come to Britain on board the Empire Windrush. They had made their pioneering journey without previous recruitment by any British employer, and without the invitation or encouragement, and initially even the knowledge, of the British authorities.


In some ways, their migration is owed to the enterprise of the captain of the captured and renamed former Nazi troop‐carrier which brought them. During its three-day berth in Kingston harbour, to which it had gone to collect and return to Britain from leave 60 West Indian Royal Air Force servicemen, he had hit on a way to fill his three‐quarters empty ship by offering passage on it at half‐fare. When it docked at Tilbury, few of the 450 West Indian civilian passengers who had been attracted to make the voyage by the cheap fare, and of whom nearly all were young men, had any jobs to go to or anywhere to stay.


Temporary accommodation was hastily arranged for those in need of it in a disused underground shelter at Clapham Common."


Has it been noticed that the first voyage would not have happened had it not been for the captain. His behaviour is described as being "enterprising"! I hope most people would not see it so. Nevertheless, without his GREED, Windrush would never have come to pass.
  
That was the reality for those brave young men who dropped everything to come to the Motherland. The UK had never witnessed such a thing. BLACK MEN TAKING IT UPON THEMSELVES TO COME TO THE MOTHERLAND.

WHAT WILL COME OF THIS?





Now let's look at the same story as told to the UK public by the Evening Standard newspaper.

The Evening Standard: Monday, June 21, 1948 


Can you imagine, the Evening Standard sent out a plane to fly over the Windrush. [CREATE EXCITEMENT, SALES, SALES, SALES] It was, without doubt a momentous event. However, is it not noticeable how the newspaper report has a similar tone to a report of the Titanic setting off on its first voyage, to doom?

The report begins with, "A dirty white ship...". Setting the scene with "dirty". Anyone reading that article would associate it with the word "dirty", especially if they have a neutral or negative point of view.


There is another little newspaper reporting trick going on here AND IT IS THE WORST. Look at the story next to it. "Wife deserts war-blinded husband". PERFECT! INVADING BLACKS AND UNFAITHFUL WIVES!

After seeing those two stories, so very "cleverly" linked, every WHITE man in the UK thought that BLACK men were invading the UK to take their women. BLACK MEN HAVE ALWAYS BEEN TREATED THAT WAY IN THE UK. GUILT BY ASSOCIATION IS A POWERFUL TOOL.

Do you see how facts yield their secret sense?

ANYWAY, PERFECT WELCOME, WOULDN'T YOU SAY!

It is almost magical. According to the Evening Standard there were 400 Jamaicans on board the Empire Windrush, one for every year of slavery. Is that not ironic?

"They found they could not get work in their own country."

Jamaicans did not find their way to that island as free people, but that's beside the point. Jamaica was a colony of the UK so who was responsible.

"The land that is, to most of them, their last hope."

Most of those young men, when asked, said there greatest hope was for a good education for their children.

When one looks at the condition of black people from the Caribbean in the UK today, can you say that the MOTHERLAND fulfilled their last hope?

The issue with the "stamp" is a massive red herring.




The UK always shows her true COLOURS IN THE END.

Then they turn everything into farce. 
BREXIT and farce also go together!

HE HAD THE STAMP? (COMPLETE SURPRISE) HE HAD THE STAMP!

HUBERT HOWARD "HAD THE STAMP" FOR 58 YEARS. THE STAMP WHICH SAYS HE IS A GENUINE WINDRUSH "CHILD". 

HOWEVER, THE UK FORGOT WHAT IT WAS, A GENUINE WINDRUSH "CHILD" I MEAN, AND HOW HE BECAME ONE.


"And after the events of recent weeks, many might wonder whether the Home Office, of all departments, is well placed to judge others on their good character."


WE MUST ALL BE CAREFUL OF PEOPLE WHO SUFFER FROM SERIAL FORGETFULNESS



Thursday, 10 May 2018

AND THE DECEPTION GOES ON

When I read the following paragraph in an article in the Guardian, I knew immediately it was incorrect.

“The passport documents that Howard travelled to the UK in 1960; his name is written on the page after his mother’s photograph, and the document contains an entry stamp confirming that they were both given indefinite leave to remain on their entry to the country.”

Amelia Gentleman, The Guardian


This is the stamp referred to in Amelia Gentleman's article



http://ow.ly/DL1Y30jYYLP




Would somebody please tell me why the Guardian is publishing incorrect information?

I REQUEST AN IMMEDIATE WRITTEN CORRECTION.

What they have done is to confirm what I have said all along. The Guardian and the United Kingdom government ARE CONFUSED, AND THAT IS BEING GENEROUS. 

The stamp in Hubert Howard’s passport proves beyond doubt that he entered the United Kingdom as a British subject, with the same rights as any subject born in the United Kingdom. 

The stamp in Mr Howard’s passport has nothing whatsoever to do with what the Guardian claims with regard to being “given indefinite leave to remain”. Hubert and his mother are subjects of the UK and are citizens. 

THIS CANNOT BE REVOKED. 

HE AND HIS MOTHER ARE UNITED KINGDOM CITIZENS, POSSESSING THE SAME RIGHTS AS THOSE BESTOWED UPON PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. LOOK AT WHAT THEY HAVE PUT THAT POOR MAN THROUGH BECAUSE HE DID NOT KNOW ANY DIFFERENT.

The Guardian, like the United Kingdom government does not know what they are talking about. When Hubert entered the UK in 1960, there was not even a concept known as citizenship, we were all “subjects”, including those born in the UK. Did any of you Parliamentarians listen to David Lammy’s wonderful parliamentary question? I DID!



The concept of, as it is now known, “Indefinite leave to remain”, correctly termed “Given leave to enter the United Kingdom for an indefinite period” was not introduced until the Immigration Act of 1971. The purpose being to FORCE us to leave the UK.

The Law even stated as follows:

"An Act to amend and replace the present immigration laws, to make certain related changes in the citizenship law and enable help to be given to those wishing to return abroad, and for purposes connected therewith."

I understand the terminology and that last phrase is sinister. DEPORTATION AND EXCLUSION!

As for the "certain changes". Give special treatment to Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, and apartheid white South Africans. Give the niggers a few pounds and send them home. If they will not go quietly, send them home anyway. You took us from Africa, used and abused us for 400 years, I say 500 because it never ended, then complain that we cannot be integrated. How could that possibly be our fault? Even today you show that you are dreadful teachers. The thing I am glad we did not learn from you is your deceit.

This makes me recall 1838. Pay compensation for 400 years of slavery, not to the slaves but to the slave owners as COMPENSATION. Today you are still talking about compensation and we are no better off. We know we will not be better off this time either, if the Crooked Maypole has her way. Even get one of us, Sajid Javid, to do the dirty work.

As I have repeatedly explained to the Home Office, they have been denying this poor man his rights for 45 years as the 1971 Act came into force 1st January 1973. (I used to incorrectly say 47 years because the act was passed in 1971). 

I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING THIS SINCE 1988 as my dead mother and “little” brother died in the same condition being termed “immigrants”, which they were not, AND I HAVE SWORN TO PUT IT RIGHT. Obviously, I was also unlawfully classified as an "immigrant" and refused a passport on the same grounds as Hubert Howard. I was told to apply for citizenship. Never will I do that!

I HAVE DETERMINED TO APPEAL TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IF THE UNITED KINGDOM MAINTAIN THEIR POSITION AND REFUSE TO  RESTORE ALL OF MY RIGHTS UNLAWFULLY ABROGATED AND FULL COMPENSATION, WHICH IS TO BE DETERMINED BY A THIRD PARTY AGREED BY BOTH PARTIES.

AS IN:

EAST AFRICAN ASIANS V THE UNITED KINGDOM (1973)


AS HUBERT HOWARD, I DO NOT NEED TO APPLY FOR CITIZENSHIP AS I AM A CITIZEN. WOULD SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL THIS TO THE CROOKED MAYPOLE SO THAT I MAY BECOME A HUMAN BEING ONCE MORE. IS THIRTY YEARS WASTED FIGHTING THIS ABOMINATION NOT ENOUGH? HOW MANY POUNDS OF FLESH DO THEY NEED?

 The Enoch Powell Immigration Act of 1971 renamed this British subject an immigrant and gave him this new appellation, “Given leave to enter the United Kingdom for an indefinite period”.

THAT WAS AN UNLAWFUL ACT WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED, I BELIEVE BY STATUTE.

Hubert is, in fact, owed compensation for the denial of his rights for 45 years as are we all.

i have repeatedly asked the UK government to state clearly when the windrush scandal began and the silence has been deafening. now I know why they dO not answer. Being charitable, i shall define it as a deception.

The photograph below which states, “Given leave to enter the United Kingdom for an indefinite period” is the means by which our rights were stolen. Furthermore, the kick in the teeth was the fact that it was not stated in our passports that if we left the UK and did not return within two years we were permanently excluded. How many UK citizens have been unlawfully denied their rights by this deception? The government must answer this question and pay us all the compensation due to us. It is their responsibility, NOT OURS AND THIS CANNOT BE DONE IN 28 DAYS.
THAT IS THE REASON THEY HAVE GIVEN US 28 DAYS TO DETERMINE FOR OURSELVES WHAT WE ARE OWED. THEY WOULD THEN CLOSE THE MATTER AS QUICKLY AS THEY POSSIBLY CAN, THEN REFUSE TO GIVE US WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY OURS. OF COURSE THEY WILL SAY WE WERE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY (THEIR WORDS, NOT MINE) TO DETERMINE WHAT WE WERE DUE.

HAS THERE EVER BEEN SUCH A CABAL OF RUTHLESS ROGUES AND VAGABONDS IN GOVERNMENT? The other word which goes with rogues and vagabonds is thieves. I shall not use that word until they have carried out their plan, IF THEY DARE!

Once again, I ask the UK government how many people have been excludeD from the UK by this deception, because deception it is?

HOW MANY HAVE DIED IN THIS CONDITION AND PROBABLY IN PENURY? HOW MANY ARE STILL ALIVE SOMEWHERE IN THE "NEW" COMMONWEALTH ALSO PROBABLY IN PENURY?




This is the stamp Amelia Gentleman thought she was referring to


Where does it state that we would be excluded if we did not return within two years? I have been excluded for twenty-one years because I allowed this two-year period to lapse. It is not valid in law with regard to Hubert Howard and how many others?


Sajid Javid please tell me how these people are supposed to tell you how much compensation they are due within 28 days. I believe you are conspiring with the Crooked Maypole to, once again, deceive us. Is not 500 years of slavery enough for the United Kingdom?


Let me tell you now Crooked Maypole, LEAVE JAMAICA ALONE, LEAVE OUR DOCTORS AND NURSES ALONE. WE CAME, WE CREATED, WE WERE TREATED LIKE SLAVES. HOW MANY MORE TIMES WILL YOU USE US AS SLAVE LABOUR?

We built the National Health Service, now the Crooked Maypole has driven out all the "ALIEN" nurses, they are back in Jamaica recruiting again. What for? So they may betray us all over again?

Do you know what really hurts? My mother and my "little" brother are buried in Forest Gate Cemetery in London and I have not been able to visit their grave in over twenty (20) years. On All Saints' Day each year I go to a cemetery to commemorate their deaths. I HAVE NO OTHER WAY!

I AM A UNITED KINGDOM CITIZEN UNABLE TO VISIT MY MOTHER'S AND MY BROTHER'S GRAVE IN LONDON.